Book review: Gambling on Development.
Zvi creates a new MX record, among other things.
And, of course, there’s ongoing chess drama. From what I saw, the initial reaction to Magnus’s implicit accusations was overwhelmingly negative. That’s not because the chess world doesn’t like to ban candidates.
PredictIt loses its special status from the CFTC; will most likely be forced to shut down. This seems like it will do real harm to the epistemological environment around politics and elections. To the extent that you’re at all worried about election security and misinformation (rather than “election security” and “misinformation”), the regulation of prediction markets does harm.
DJB is suspicious of the PQC selection process at NIST, and has filed a FOIA lawsuit.
Robin Hanson on STEM progress and moral “progress”. The corollary is that STEM progress is moral progress, while moral research is not moral progress.
ACOUP writes a progress studies piece, sort of. As he says, “the key takeaway here is just how contingent the industrial revolution was”. I’m less convinced than I should be, I think. An inevitable event (thousands of different paths cause X) can appear contingent (“look how unusual and contingent the path to X was!"). It’s difficult to distinguish the two without being able to consider counterfactuals.
White House announces debt forgiveness. Not only is this a year of jubilee, but all years will be years of jubilee. “If you can’t say anything nice, say nothing at all”; nevertheless it seems appropriate for taxes to be raised specifically on people with college degrees. We could determine the taxation rate by polling graduates about what they think the correct taxation rate is… but that would just be cruel.